FREE ESSAY ON A SHADOWED HISTORY IN AFRICA

A SHADOWED HISTORY IN AFRICA

One Shadowed History in Africa 
A paper submitted to Dr. Wilimons 
In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the 
Bachelors of Science Degree in Business Administration 
Course: English 102
Section: II
Semester: Winter 1999
Outline
Thesis: Apartheid was a long shadow in the history of South Africa.
I. Apartheid caused hatred among the people.
A) Whites and black South Africans could not live together.
B) The African people developed an ethnic consciousness. 
II. Apartheid caused high illiteracy rate in the black community.
A) Blacks were not allowed to go to school.
B) Blacks were forced to learn Afrikaner unwillingly.
III. Apartheid caused political oppression.
A) The right to speak in public was taken from political parties.
B) Political leaders are arrested en masse.
IV. Apartheid caused million of deaths.
A) Students were tortured.
B) Civilians were massacred in Sharpeville.
V. Apartheid caused international mediation.
A) The world condemned apartheid for its cruelty.
B) The effects of the Apartheid has left a nation that needs to rebuild.
C) The Apartheid is a tragic part of history, which must not be repeated.
Introduction
Nelson Mandela is one of the great moral and political leaders of our time: an
international hero whose lifelong dedication to the fight against racial oppression in
South Africa won him the Nobel Peace Prize and the presidency of his country. Since his
triumphant release in 1990 from more than a quarter-century of imprisonment, Mandela has
been at the center of the most compelling and inspiring political drama in the world. As
president of the African National Congress and head of South Africa's anti-apartheid
movement, he was instrumental in moving the nation toward multiracial government and
majority rule. He is revered everywhere as a vital force in the fight for human rights
and racial equality. 
The election of Nelson Mandela in 1994 marked the first time all race elections were held
in South Africa and the end of all white rule in South Africa. Prior to 1994, only white
people held political control with the majority of people living in South Africa having
little to no real representation in government. One word described the racist system that
kept non-whites from political and social equality and became infamously known around the
world: Apartheid. Apartheid was not a case of just "I am white and I don't like blacks."
It was a complex system of social separation - called segregation under British rule. It
was a system of cheap labor enforced by laws, social, and industrial practices. There was
also an ideology that justified it; whatever one did to question it, there was the
pre-existing attitude "we are civilized and they are not." 
In 1910 the British parliament passed the Act of Union that brought British and Afrikaans
colonies together to create a united and independent South Africa. Unfortunately, the
newly created country did not break from a tradition of discrimination and segregation.
Instead these practices became even further entrenched as bills were passed to ensure
white domination.
However, it wasn't until 1948 and the election of Dr. D.F. Malan's Nationalist Party that
the concepts of apartheid became officially government policy (Moodie, 1994, p12). Malan
was victorious in the election, beating the United Party and its leader Jan Smuts by
portraying Smuts and his party as too liberal and not capable of dealing with the swart
gevar (Afrikaans for black peril). In a country controlled by a white minority, fear
tactics worked for the Nationalists, and they managed a slender parliamentary majority.
From 1948 on, official apartheid principles were put into practical effect, and Malan's
government passed bills designed to maintain political, economic, and social control by
whites over non-whites (Robinson, 1968, p.87).
Under apartheid, people were classified into one of four categories: White, Colored,
Indian, and Black. As a non-white, one was required to carry a passbook that detailed
one's racial grouping, employer, place of dwelling, and permission to be (on a temporary
basis only) in a white area. In 1954 the Resettlement of Natives Act meant that entire
towns and villages in which non-whites lived were suddenly designated to be white-only
areas. The entire population would then be forced to resettle into tribal reserves. As
well, Blacks not needed for labor in white communities (referred to as superfluous Bantu
by the nationalist government) were sent to live in these homelands. During the 1960's,
nearly three million Africans were moved onto the Bantustans (Porter, 1991, p.32). Blacks
would be removed from their homes, trucked to their new homeland, and dumped on land with
little or no agricultural value and no infrastructure. The result was mass starvation and
major epidemics. In an effort to give credibility to the reserves, the 1953 Nationalist
government passed the Bantu Authorities Act allowing Bantustans to become independent
homelands. In reality, however, Bantustans proved to be nothing more than holding areas
for cheap labor for the white economy (Report of the Select Committee on the Immorality
Amendment Bill, 1968, p. 9).
Meanwhile charges of racism were coming from both inside South Africa and around the
world. Oliver Tambo, a leading political activist against apartheid and president of the
African National Congress (ANC), outlines what it meant to be a non-white living in
apartheid South Africa in his paper Human Right in South Africa:
During the last two decades human values in our country sank to primitive levels as
elementary human rights were trampled underfoot on a scale unparalleled in recent
history. This occurred in open and direct defiance of the United Nations and the entire
international community. It is as well to remember that the men in power in South Africa
today wholeheartedly supported Nazism and have never repented of it.
The African and other non-white people in Africa do not enjoy the right to take part in
government nor can they vote for representatives who govern. The Constitution of the
Republic of South Africa (passed in 1961) specifically excludes non-whites from any
participation in the councils of the State.
They do not have the right to assemble with others and join - or refrain from joining -
any legitimate organization or group. They cannot enjoy a full cultural life in
accordance with their artistic, literary and scientific inclinations. On the contrary,
the majority of the people are excluded from places of culture or entertainment, from
libraries, from scientific institutions.
Our people do not have the right to travel without hindrance within the country or leave
the country. The notorious pass laws and the Departure from the Republic Regulation Act
prevent this.
Africans do not have the right to a job and in fact are legally prevented from doing a
large variety of jobs which are reserved for whites. They have no rights of collective
bargaining, and cannot form or join a labor union, even one recognized by the State.
Africans cannot agitate and cannot go on strike in order to better their working
conditions and pay (Tambo, 1968, p.29).
In reaction to being excluded from political power by the 1910 Act of Union, due to the
color of their skin, a group of chiefs, Christian ministers, and intellectuals came
together to form the South African Native National Congress. In 1923 this organization
changed its name to become the African National Congress (ANC). The ANC believed that
Africans should work together as a united force to bring about political change and
racial equality (Mandela, 1995, pp. 12-15). Initially, the ANC stuck to a strict policy
of pacifist resistance. However, frustration with a lack of results led the ANC's
militant Youth League, formed in 1944 under the leadership of Nelson Mandela, Oliver
Tambo, and Walter Sisulu, to advocate becoming more aggressive in the struggle. At an ANC
conference in 1949, Mandela and his colleagues passed the Program of Resistance that was
to change the nature of the ANC. The Program of Resistance called for boycotts, strikes,
and civil disobedience to bring an end to racial discrimination (Thompson, 1996, p. 65).
The fundamental principles of the Program of Action of the African National Congress were
inspired by the desire to achieve national freedom. By national freedom, they meant
freedom from white domination and the attainment of political independence. That implied
the rejection of the conception of segregation, apartheid, trusteeship, or white
leadership, which were all, in one way or another, motivated by the idea of white
domination or domination of the whites over the Blacks (Thompson, 1996, pp. 13-21).
In 1955, opponents of apartheid, including "The South African Indian Congress," "The
Colored People's organization," the white's Congress of Democrats, and the ANC, met at
the "Congress of the People" where they drafted the Freedom Charter. The Freedom Charter
became the declaration for all of these organizations fighting for democracy and human
rights. It declared that "We, the People of South Africa, declare for all our country and
the world to know: that South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white, and
that no government can justly claim authority unless it is based on the will of all the
people" (Porter, 1991, p.31).
In 1949 the National Party led government set up the Eislen Commission, a specially
appointed commission given the task of restructuring the education system according to
the apartheid philosophy. The commission recommended that different races should receive
different forms of education. For example, Black children were to be taught in such a way
that the Bantu child will be able to find his way in European communities, to follow oral
or written instructions, and to carry on a simple conversation with Europeans about his
work and other subjects of common interest. These recommendations became law in the 1955
Bantu Education Act. In short, Blacks were to be trained to do manual labor and to follow
the instructions of whites (Porter, 1991, pp.25-45).
In response to the Bantu Education Act, the ANC held a boycott of government schools, and
set up their own schools. Nelson Mandela spoke out against the introduction of Bantu
Education, calling for community activists to make every home, every shack or rickety
structure a center of learning (Mandela, 1995, p. 45). However government, forces cracked
down on these private schools, declaring unlicensed schools illegal and forcing the
students to return to the public schools. Education became a major rallying point for the
fight against apartheid as the Nationalist government's racist policies radicalized the
youth. Black youth became reluctant to participate in an educational system designed to
create a menial labor force for the white economy (Elder, 1993, pp.12-26). 
In 1959, a militant group of Africanists split from the ANC and formed the Pan African
Congress (PAC), led by Robert Sobukwe. For the first time, the ANC was challenged as the
leading voice against apartheid. On March 21, 1960, Robert Sobukwe initiated widespread
anti-pass law demonstrations. People gathered in thousands at the police station where
passes were to be destroyed. As the morning wore on, the crowd, which journalists found
perfectly amiable, appeared to the police increasingly menacing (Thompson, 1996, pp.
74-82). In the early afternoon, seventy-five policemen fired some 700 shots into the
crowd, killing 69 Africans and wounding 180. Among them were women and children. Most of
the dead had been shot in the back. That evening, a thousand miles away, outside Cape
Town, the protest drew 10,000 people: again the panic, again the shooting. Two Africans
were killed, and 49 injured. Outrage swept the country, precipitating riots, strikes, and
mass demonstrations. The government declared a state of emergency. Both the African
National Congress and the Pan African Congress were outlawed. Some 20,000 people were
detained. Most were African men, both leaders and so-called vagrants. Men and women of
all races were rounded up, not just members of the Congress Alliance, but members of the
Liberal Party (Jackson, 1987, pp. 27-45). It seemed that the liberation movement must
surely be crushed, but detainees were able to conspire while in jail. One group of
whites, including members of the multi-racial Liberal Party, agreed that after
Sharpeville non-violent protest was futile. Upon release, a group of African men began to
recruit like-minded men and women, among them former leaders of the National Union of
South African Students and journalists. They formed a sabotage group, recruited black
members, and called themselves the National Committee of Liberation (later changed to
African Resistance Movement). Their first action in December 1960 went unnoticed, and it
was not until October 1961 that their sabotage was reported. During the following two
years, such actions continued sporadically (Jackson, 1987, pp. 45-69). 
Among black detainees, it was decided to make one last attempt at non-violent protest.
After their release, they called an All African Conference in March of 1961. Nelson
Mandela, momentarily free of bans, was elected to lead a National Action Council, and to
renew the demand for a National Convention in order to establish a new union of all South
Africans. In support of the demand, a nationwide stay-at-home strike was to take place
over two days in May. Organizing from the underground, Mandela was assisted in his
clandestine existence by comrades of all races. In the days leading up to the strike, the
government called out police and army. A massive display of force was directed at the
African townships. On the second day, Mandela was obliged to call off the strike.
Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of Africans had responded to his call, and in Durban
they had been joined by Indian workers. In Cape Town, for the first time, there was a
substantial response from the Colored people. Mandela spoke of the immense courage this
took, and he declared, If the Government reaction is to crush by naked force our
non-violent struggle, we will have to reconsider our tactics (Mandela, 1995, pp. 76-92)
Early in June 1961, Mandela took part in secret deliberations with a small group from the
outlawed African National Congress. The crucial decision was made: after half a century
of non-violence, the policy of the African National Congress must change. The main
organization would continue its underground organizing and would remain non-violent, but
a select few of the African National Congress would unite to undertake controlled
violence. Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation) was formed. Sabotage was to be their
first form of action because, as Mandela was to explain, It did not involve loss of life,
and it offered the most hope for future race relations. (Mandela, 1995, pp. 78-79). 
Umkhonto`s first acts of sabotage took place on December 16, 1961. A few days earlier,
Chief Albert Lutuli had received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo. It was as though this
event set the seal on a long and extraordinary history for, as he said in his address,
the honor must be accepted in the name of the true patriots of South Africa, all those in
the African National Congress who had set the organization steadfastly against racial
vain-gloriousness (Tambo, 1968, pp. 56-60). The shootings at Sharpeville had sent waves
of outrage around the world. It was as if the international community had suddenly
realized the full horror of apartheid and had seen how police violence had escalated
through the long years of oppression. The award of the prize to Lutuli was a measure of
the world's sympathy, admiration, and perhaps its guilt (Robinson, 1990, pp. 135-162).
In the 1980s, people took the liberation struggle to new heights. In the workplace, in
the community, and in the schools, the people aimed to take control of their situation.
All areas of life became areas of political struggle. These strugglers were linked to the
demand for political power. Botha, the president back then, was powerless and was forced
to resign. The senate then appointed F.W. De Klerk (Robinson, 1990, p. 8).
To end apartheid was a decision by President F.W. De Klerk, who then released the
imprisoned ANC leader Nelson Mandela unconditionally in February 1990, after he had
served 27 years in jail. At this point, the ANC's consistent adherence to the principle
of non-racial democracy paid enormous dividends. It created a ground base of trust that
enabled all political parties, black and white, to meet and to hammer out a transitional
constitution (Mandela, 1995, pp. 140-152). 
The end of Apratheid led to a Government of National Unity far wider and more explicit
than the attempts to heal political breaches made by previous South African presidents 
South Africa then reached a turning point in its history after the first democratic
elections in 1994 and the rise to political power of Nelson Mandela. Still, one cannot
begin to understand the history of South Africa without considering the effects of four
and a half decades of Apartheid. Most black people working today are engaged in dealing
with the legacy of the past as retold to them weekly in the South African press reportage
on the Truth and Reconciliation Committee. For many, the new era in South Africa has
brought little appreciable change in the standard of living partially because foreign
industries that divested their interests there during the 1980s have been slow to return
despite the dramatic political changes that have taken place (Elder, 1993, pp.152-163).
The time of post-revolutionary euphoria is coming to a close in South Africa. Continued
poverty, inadequate housing, an overburdened education system, and many other leftovers
from the Apartheid era still hamper the forging of a new nation and the remaking of ideas
about society. 
South African history has shown how effectively a distorted, but legalized distribution
of power can bring about a warped social system when backed by strong-willed security
forces, how the moral authority of a determined opposition, even outside the legalized
structures, can challenge that power if it can operate from a secure base and receive
support from outside. Let's therefore unite our forces, fight, and challenge each one of
us for a better future of South African children and let apartheid be no more.
References
Elder, G.S. (1993). The controls and regulations in apartheid South Africa. London:
Mapping & Co.
Jackson, P. (1987). Race and Racism in South Africa, London: Allen & Unwin. 
Porter, K., and Weeks, J. (1991). Between the Acts. London: Routledge. 
Republic of South Africa (1968). Report of the Select Committee on the Immorality
Amendment Bill. Cape Town: Government Printers. 
Robinson, J. (1990) A perfect system of control: State power and native locations in
South Africa. Environment and Planning Society and Space pp. 8, 135-162. 
Robinson, J. (1994). From Anti-apartheid to Post-colonialism. London: Guilford Press. 
Thompson, L. (1996). A History of South Africa. Yale University Press. 
Mandela, N. (1995). Long Walk to Freedom. Pretoria: Little Brown 
Tambo, O. (1968). Human Rights in South Africa. London: Random House
Reference Bibliography
Beavon., K. (1982). Black townships in South Africa: Terra incognita for urban
geographers. South African Geographical Journal, pp. 64 -70. 
Hart, D.M., and Pirie, G.H. (1984). The sight and soul of Sophiatown. Geographical
Review, pp. 38-47, 74. 
Kobayashi, A., and Peake, L. (1994). Unnatural discourse: race and gender in South
Africa. Culture Magazine, pp. 225-243. 
Moodie, T.D. (1994). A Rainbow Nation. United States: University of California Press. 
Platzsky, L. and Walker, C. (1985). The Surplus People: Forced Removals in South Africa.
Johannesburg: Ravan Press. 
Rogerson, C.M. And Parnell, S.M. (1989). Fostered by the larger: apartheid human
geography in the 1980's. Mail & Guardian Magazine, pp. 13-26. 
Smith, S. (1989). The Politics of Race and Residence. Cambridge: Polity Press. 
Waldmeir, P. (1997). Anatomy of a Miracle. London: Norton Press. 
Paton, A. (1995). Cry the Beloved Country London: Scribner. First published in 1948. 
Slovo, G. (1997). Every Secret Thing. Pretoria: Brown Publishing. 
Boynton, G. (1997). Last Days in Cloud Cuckooland. London: Random House. 
A History of the African National Congress (ANC). (nd). *http://www.anc
.org.za/ancdocs/about/umzabalazo.html*.
Black Power. (1994, May 9). Newsweek. *http://aace.virg
inia.edu/go/capetown/B-black.html*. (1999, March 10)
Project Capetown: Education and Integration in South Africa (1995, February 12).
*http://curry.edsch ool.Virginia.EDU/go/capetown/* 
The End of Apartheid (n.d.) http:/ /www.southafrica.net/government/history/apartend.html
Silke, S. What Shaped South Africa? (1997). *http://www.sapolitics.co.z a/history.htm*