FREE ESSAY ON ROMEO AND JULIET, LOVERS FOR ALL TIME

ROMEO AND JULIET, LOVERS FOR ALL TIME

*BODY*
*H1 CLASS=title*Romeo and Juliet, Lovers for All Times*/H1*
*DIV ID=boilerplate*
For: English 442 Purdue University*BR*
©1998 Chrisitan L Mattix*BR*
*/DIV*
*HR*
*DIV ID=mainBody*
*P*Ever since the publications of the *Q CITE=Evans:Riverside Shakespeare:1093*good
quarto,*/Q* published in 
1599, *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE*, by William Shakespeare, has been one of the 
classics of Western literature (Evans 1093). In being this, it has been 
produced many different times, in many different ways. I will be discussing how 
the production of this great play has changed over time. First, though, I will 
supply a little background for the play.*/P*
*P*The stories of two star-crossed lovers and forbidden passion are not new to 
literature. There were many works before *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE* from which 
Shakespeare borrowed. Some of these include Mosuccio of Salerno in his 1476 
work, *CITE*Il Novellin o*/CITE*, Luigi da Proto with his *CITE*Istoria . . .di due 
nobili Amanti*/CITE*, in about 1530, and Arthur Brooke’s three thousand line 
poem titled *CITE*The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet*/CITE*, published in 1562 
(Evans 1055). All of these had the same themes as *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE*. This 
borrowing of ideas and loose use of the text continued in the manner in which 
the play has been produced. */P*
*P*In 1745 and 1750 David Garrick direct several productions of *CITE*Romeo and 
Juliet*/CITE* (Branam 170). In these productions he made several changed to both 
the way the characters are presented and to the play itself. In a 1748 text, 
Garrick wrote a note *Q CITE=Garrick:To the Reader*To the Reader:*/Q**/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:173*The
alterations in the following play are few and trifling, except in the 
last act; the design was to clear the Original, as much as possible from the 
Jingle and the Quibble, which were always thought the great objections to 
reviving it (qtd. In Branam 173).*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Garrick uses several means to remove the *Q CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's
Romeo and Juliet:173*Jingle and Quibble*/Q* from 
the play (Branam 173). Where he thought the rhyme and wordplay to be excessive 
he would compact it. For example the long drawn out exchange between Samson and 
Gregory in the first scene is compressed to four lines:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:173*
Sam. Gregory, I strike quickly, being mov'd.*BR*
Gred. But thou are not quickly mov'd to strike.*BR*
Sam. A dog of the house of Montague moves.*BR*
Greg. Draw thy tool then, for here come of that house.*BR*
(qtd. In Branam 173)*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Garrick also took liberty with Romeo's lyrical nature. He shortened 
many of Romeo's lines in order to dull it somewhat. For example, Garrick 
shortens:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:173-174*
Why such is love's transgression. *BR*
Griefs of mine own lie heavy in my breast;*BR*
Which thou wilt propagate, to have it prest*BR*
With more of thine: this love that thou hast shown*BR*
Doth add more grief to too much of mine own.*BR*
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*From act one, scene one, to:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:173-174*
Which thou wilt propagate with more of thine;*BR*
This love, that thou hast shewn in my concern,*BR*
Doth add more grief to too much of mine own.*BR*
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*in his 1748 text (Branam 173-174). In reading the play the rhyme is missed, 
but in watching a performance the mood is more set by the interaction of the two 
lovers, then the actual words. */P*
*P*Another change that Garrick made, albeit reluctantly and under pressure, was 
the complete removal of Rosaline from the play. In 1784 he explains:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:177*
Many people have imagin'd that the sudden change of Romeo's Love 
from Rosaline to Juliet was a blemish in his Character, but alteration of that 
kind was thought too bold to be attempted; Shakespear [sic.] has dwelt 
particularly upon it, and so great a judge of human nature, knew that to be 
young and inconstant was extremely natural (qtd. In Branam 177).
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Garrick's largest, and most prominent, change was in modifying the tomb 
scene. Here Garrick borrows from Thomas Otwayis *CITE*History and Fall of 
Caius Marius*/CITE*, published in 1679 and based on *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE* (Branam

174). In Shakespeare's original work the act of the poison on Romeo is 
almost instantaneous, but in Garrick’s new rendition the poison acts 
slowly. This gives new light to both Romeo and Juliet's characters. 
Garrick designed the scene to be more tragic then the original play. In this 
rendition, Romeo sees Juliet and she speaks to him:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:174-175*
I now remember well*BR*
Each circumstance – Oh my lord, my Romeo! *BR*
Had'st thou not come, sure I slept for ever:*BR*
But there's a sovereign charm in thy embraces*BR*
That can revive the dead – Oh honest Friar! –
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Romeo is filled with joy seeing his love alive, but suddenly realizes the 
horror of the situation and is overcome by it. Juliet continues:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:173-174*
Dost thou avoid me, Romeo? let me touch*BR*
Thy hand. And taste the cordial of thy lips –*BR*
You fright me – speak – (qtd. In Branam 174-175)
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*John Hill in *CITE*The Actor*/CITE* (1755) describes Spranger Barry's 
portrayal of the situation:*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Branam:The Genesis of David Garrick's Romeo and Juliet:175*
Thus we see in the character of Romeo a scene of distress, to which no other 
can be equal: his wife, on whose suppos'd death he had swallowed poison, 
revived, and himself dying of the effect of that poison; snd we see, as Mr. 
Barry plays it, his sensib ility getting the better of his articulation; his 
grief takes effect upon the organs of his voice; and the very tone of it is 
altered: it is broken, hoarse, and indistinct. We give the applause to this 
consummate piece of playing that it deserves: we natu re triumphing over what we 
would direct: and we give it a praise which are without this strong appearance 
of nature never could deserve (qtd. in Branam 175). 
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Many modern productions of *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE* also have changed some 
parts of the play. For example the 1968 production directed by Franco Zefirelli 
cut several lines out and changed the ending such that the two clans did not 
find the lovers' bodies in the tomb, but carried them into the town, with 
no indication that they had formed a peace between them. Zefirelli, in an 
interview conduvted by John Tibbetts, explains his opinion of Shakespeare.*/P*
*BLOCKQUOTE CITE=Tibbette:Breaking the Classical Barrier: Franco Zefirelli
interviewed:138-139*
You know, I think culture – especially opera and Shakespeare – 
must be available to as many people as possible. It irritates me that some 
people want art to be as difficult as possible, an elitist kind of 
thing. I want to give these things back to the people (138-139). 
*/BLOCKQUOTE*
*P*Others do note share Zefirelli's opinion of freely changing the plays. 
Michael Flachmann in his review of Romeo and Juliet at La Jolla, in 1983 states, 
*Q CITE=Flachmann:Romeo and Juliet, At La Jolla, 1983:106*Romeo and Juliet is a
particularly frequent victim of this preoccupation 
with finding a concept or gimmick to render the tragedy 
intelligible to its (supposedly) benighted viewers*/Q* (Flachmann 106). This 
production was altered from the original only in costume. In the beginning, 
before the costume ball, all the characters are in contemporary clothing. After 
the ball and up to the death scene they are in Renaissance garb. After the death 
scene the characters reappear in modern dress, this time with stark white and 
black tones. *Q CITE=Romeo and Juliet, At La Jolla, 1983:107*The total
effect at the end was a frightening rush back into 
reality, a chilling reminder that the same feud had been reaping its disastrous 
consequences for centuries,*/Q* Flachmann states (107).*/P*
*P*Another production was altered, like La Jola, not with dialogue but with only 
costume and scenery. The costumes in this production were best described at 
hip retro '70s with each character wearing something 
appropriate for his role: Benvolio in a white poet's shirt and crushed 
velvet pants, Juliet with a boldly colored spaghetti-strapped dress, and Romeo 
with a black leather trenchcoat (Johnson-Haddad 87). The set also differed from 
what was originally intended. The opening scene starts with Friar Laurence 
kneeling between two models of palaces. Here he recites the *Q*Two houses, 
alike in dignity. . .*/Q* prologue, motioning to each of the palaces when. 
Then the quarrel scene between the two houses' servants takes place behind 
a large white shroud where the audience can only see large silhouettes. The 
scene closes with the Prince breaking up the brawl and the actors freezing in 
place as a large red ribbon falls in front of the curtain and finally the 
curtain itself falling to the floor. This leaves the actors seemingly hovering 
in an endless black stage. Johnson-Haddad calls the scene *Q
CITE=Johnson-Haddad:Shakespeare Performed, The Shakespeare Theatre,
1993-1994:87*distinctive and 
fowerfully soncieved, . . . it sets the mood for the innovative production to 
come*/Q* (87). */P*
*P*The newest cinematic adaption has also made many changes to the original. In 
the 1997 film *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE*, directed my Baz Luhrmann, the characters are
set 
in a darker modern southern Florida *Q CITE=McCarthy:REVIEW/FILM:Romeo and Juliet: Update

Over The Top*dominated by designer guns, customized 
cars, and incessant music*/Q* (McCarthy 1).*/P*
*P*Luhrmann uses race to differentiate between the two clans, though the effect 
is subtle. The Capulates are predominantly Latino, while the Montagues are 
mainly white. Religious symbolism plays a large role in the film as well. Tybalt 
has a large tat oo of the Virgin Mary on his chest, and Juliet's room is 
inundated with angels and other icons. Friar Laurence's chapel is a large 
cathedral with a huge statue of Jesus separating the skyrises owned by each of 
the feuding houses.*/P*
*P*While Lurmann went fast and loose with the setting and costume, he stuck to 
the text. Most of the second filial text is included in the film, with minor 
changes. Todd McCarthy says that most of the cast adequatly portrays the 
original text's meaning with one supurb exception, Claire Danes as 
Juliet. *Q CITE=McCarthy:REVIEW/FILM:Romeo and Juliet Update 
Over The Top*Danes has somehow found a way to both enunciate the Shakespearean lingo 
[sic.] and make its meaning lucid and accessible in a way that eludes most of 
the others*/Q*, McCarty states (1).*/P*
*P*The exotic setting is the main change in the work. It is set in Verona Beach, 
Florida, which is loosely based on a darker Miami. The location or Romeo's 
banishment is a trailer park in what looks like the Arizona badlands. Here the 
film almost loses credibility, when you consider the contemporary reaction to 
banishment, but the play still maintains its focus.*/P*
*P*Shakespeare's *CITE*Romeo and Juliet*/CITE* has been performed in many different 
ways with many different media, and through this it is still considered an 
important part of Western literature. With all of the changes that many 
different producers have made, the story still remains one of passion, romance, 
and tradegy. In every lover we see at least part of Romeo or Juliet; and as long 
at that holds true the play will remain a classic.*/P*
*/DIV*
*HR WIDTH=100%*
*DIV ID=WorksCited*
*H1 CLASS=title*Works Cited*/H1*
*P CLASS=citation*Branam, George C. *SPAN CLASS=periodical*The Genesis of David Garrick's
Romeo and Juliet*/SPAN*. *SPAN CLASS=source*Shakespeare Quarterly*/SPAN* 32.2 (1989):
170-179.*/P*
*P CLASS=citation*Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. *SPAN CLASS=book*The Riverside
Shakespeare*/SPAN*. Boston: Haughton Mifflin Company, 1974.*/P*
*P CLASS=citation*Flachmann, Michael. *SPAN CLASS=periodical*Romeo and Juliet, At La
Jolla, 1983.*/SPAN* *SPAN CLASS=source*Shakespeare Quarterly*/SPAN* 35.1 (1984):
105-107.*/P*
*P CLASS=citation*Johnson-Haddad, Miranda. *SPAN CLASS=periodical*Shakespeare Performed,
The Shakespeare Theatre, 1993-1994.*/SPAN* *SPAN CLASS=source*Shakespeare
Quarterly*/SPAN* 37.1 (1995): 82-90.*/P*
*P CLASS=citation*McCarthy, Todd. *SPAN CLASS=periodical*REVIEW/FILM: Romeo and Juliet
Update Over The Top.*/SPAN* *SPAN CLASS=source*Yahoo News*/SPAN*. 
http://www.yahoo.com/headlines/961028/entertainment/stories/review_romeo_1.html 
News (29 Oct. 1996, 2:15 AM).*/P*
*P CLASS=citation*Tibbitts, John C. *SPAN CLASS=periodical*Breaking the Classical
Barrier: Franco Zefirelli interviewed.*/SPAN* *SPAN CLASS=source*Literature/Film
Quarterly*/SPAN* 22.2 (1994): 136-140.*/P*
*/DIV*
*/BODY*
*/HTML*